![]() |
![]() |
أنظمة الموقع |
![]() |
تداول في الإعلام |
![]() |
للإعلان لديـنا |
![]() |
راسلنا |
![]() |
التسجيل |
![]() |
طلب كود تنشيط العضوية |
![]() |
تنشيط العضوية |
![]() |
استعادة كلمة المرور |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
#1 |
خبير عملات
تاريخ التسجيل: Feb 2004
المشاركات: 381
|
![]() How will the US Presidential Elections Impact the Dollar? By Kathy Lien, Chief Strategist of Forex Capital Markets LLC, DailyFX.com Published Date: October 15, 2004 With less than 3 weeks until the US Presidential Elections, FX market watchers are looking for clues as to how the US dollar and other financial markets could perform on the heels of a Republican or Democratic victory. The candidates are running neck and neck following the third and final debate and it is still unclear who the winner will be. This means that positioning remains skeptical and the market does not have enough information to discount a victory by a particular party prior to the election. Although it is difficult to correctly assess exactly how the dollar will move on a Bush or Kerry victory, if history can be used as a reliable benchmark, success by one candidate may be worse for the dollar than the other. Republican Incumbent Candidate – George W. Bush Considering solely the economic policy implications of a Bush victory, the market might reasonably expect the dollar to continue its downward trend against its major counterparts. Thus far, President Bush has been fiscally liberal, cutting taxes and increasing noninterest federal spending by 8% annually. In response to sizable job losses in several swing states, Bush has sought to make job creation a key domestic priority, evidenced by a $23 billion proposal for job training and employment assistance in fiscal year 2005. Given the stagnant labor market, the Administration would be ill advised to do anything other than maintain its “soft dollar” policy that has been enhancing the competitiveness of American manufacturers and multinationals. Moreover, taking a look at history, Republican Presidents tend to be more positive for the dollar than Democratic Presidents. This of course does not always hold true. For example Republican President Regan succumbed to domestic politics and endorsed the Plaza Accord, which was aimed at depreciating the value of the dollar. The continuation of other Bush fiscal policies aimed at stimulating growth could also be viewed as potential medium-term dollar negatives. Bush’s bid to make permanent the tax cuts from his electionyear plan threatens to erode confidence in the greenback by creating persistently wider fiscal deficits. The 10-year cost of such an extension could be between 1 and 2 trillion dollars. Although the President has promised to cut the federal budget deficit in half over the next five years, making the tax cut permanent would make it very difficult for him to achieve this goal. Yet Republican Presidents have favorable tax policies for US corporations, which could help boost stocks. Although some may argue that the less negative dollar ramifications of the incumbent President’s reelection may be less applicable in the upcoming election, markets (and the dollar) have generally welcomed a steady financial policy. New presidents tend to often administer “bitter medicine” to correct economic problems once they take office in what may be taken as “correcting the previous administration’s problems.” Democratic Candidate – John Kerry Expectations for a second Bush term would mark a continuation of the economic status quo, namely a currency policy in tacit support of a weaker dollar. Yet the market may respond positively to Democratic candidate John Kerry’s fiscal responsibility measures. Both candidates have pledged to halve the federal budget deficit. However, Kerry’s plan to reverse President Bush’s tax cuts and to raise taxes on long-term capital gains from 15% to 20% and the top rate on dividends from 15% to 39.6% may give him a head start. However although Kerry advocates more fiscal responsibility, his policies may lead to looser monetary policy. Cutting back spending may force the Federal Reserve to slow the removal of monetary policy accommodation in order to effectively give enough stimulus to an economy that is still struggling to accelerate growth. With talks of protectionism and the intention of raising taxes on long-term capital gains from 15% to 20% and the top rate on dividends from 15% to 39.6%, he is seen as negative for stocks and positive for bonds. Kerry’s bid to reverse Bush’s tax cuts could also crimp consumer spending. Essentially higher tax rates and more regulations could slow GDP growth, economic efficiency and productivity. Also, if Republicans retain full control of Congress and the House (which appears likely), a victory by Kerry would mean a divided government. This is exceptionally important since all tax laws originate from the House. The only respite would be foreign reaction towards a Kerry victory. Some believe that Kerry’s foreign policies would be more inclusive and viewed positively. This could reduce some of the risk premium that foreigners may have placed on US assets. آسف علي عدم الترجمة لضيق الوقت |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
خبير عملات
تاريخ التسجيل: Nov 2003
المشاركات: 52
|
![]()
يامساء الفل بالغالي عماد
فينك ياراقل !! عموما بالنسبة لهالمقال , راح تحصل الترجمة له كامله باللغة العربية على هذا الرابط http://www.forex.com.sa/vb/showthrea...&threadid=1471 هناك بض المقالات الأخرى المترجمة مثل كيفية تأثير الانتخابات الرئاسية على الأسهم, والسندات, والعملات http://www.forex.com.sa/vb/showthrea...&threadid=1480 تحياتي لك |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
مواقع النشر (المفضلة) |
|
|